Montclair State University Case Library

To View Full Case Details.

Register Now
Already Have an account? Log In

Apple Inc. in 2026 - Competing in the Age of AI

Last Updated: 10/16/2026

Case Organization

Montclair State University

Affordable, inclusive, and innovative.


https://www.montclair.edu

1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, United States of America

Higher Education Institution

101-500

Case Contributors

Ethne Swartz

Professor of Information Management and Entrepreneurship @ Montclair State University for 8 year(s)

Ethné Swartz, Ph.D., is Professor of Information Management and Entrepreneurship and a 2018-2019 Fulbright Scholar in South Africa where she is based at the University of Pretoria's Gordon Institute of Business Science. She joins the Feliciano School of Business from Fairleigh Dickinson’s Silberman College of Business where she was on the faculty from 2000 to 2018, holding the rank of full professor and serving as a Sam Walton Fellow and Advisor to the FDU Enactus Chapter. From 2006 to 2014, she chaired the Marketing and Entrepreneurship Department and then served as an associate dean in the Silberman College of Business. She earned a Ph.D. in in Management from the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK and an MS in Information Systems from Manchester Metropolitan University. A South African native, she holds a B.A. (Hons) in Sociology from Rhodes University, South Africa and a B.A. in Psychology/Sociology from the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Her research and teaching interests include strategic management, entrepreneurship and innovation, management of technology, business continuity and crisis management.

Dr. Swartz was a Fulbright Scholar based at Zeppelin University in Germany during the spring of 2014. She will be based at the University of Pretoria’s Gordon Institute of Business Science during spring and summer of 2019, focusing on women’s entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. She also conducts research on how women who own or manage high-growth companies can best participate in negotiating term sheets for capital investment in their companies.

Dr. Swartz is an active contributor to New Jersey’s entrepreneurial organizations and ecosystem. She has been active in the United States Association of Small Business and Entrepreneurship (USASBE), serving as a board member and as the Vice President of Conference for the annual conference in January 2011. She has served as USASBE’s Vice President of Publications, most recently creating the USASBE Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, published by Edward Elgar. She is the co-author of two books and her research articles have appeared in the International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Long Range Planning, Risk Management: An International Journal, Journal of Applied Management Studies, Leadership and Organisational Development Journal, Business Horizons, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Facilities, Education and Training; ET&P. She serves on the editorial board of the Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy and previously served as an associate editor for the Journal of Small Business Management. From 1994 to October 1999, Dr. Swartz taught Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship at Leicester Business School, DeMontfort University, in Leicester, UK, where she was instrumental in setting up a center for research into business continuity management. Prior to her academic career, Dr. Swartz worked at General Motors (South Africa) and Kodak (South Africa).

Case Disciplines

Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Entrepreneurship Growth Strategy Innovation Legal, Regulatory, Compliance Product Design & Development Research & Development Strategic Planning

Skills & Expertise

AI Strategy Antitrust Analysis Brand Strategy Build Versus Buy Analysis Business Model Innovation Competitive Analysis Coopetition Strategy Cybersecurity Strategy Data Governance Data Privacy Strategy Ecosystem Strategy Executive Decision Making Financial Analysis Innovation Strategy Make Versus Partner Analysis Partnership Governance Platform Strategy Regulatory Analysis Revenue Model Development Risk Assessment Scenario Planning Services Strategy Stakeholder Analysis Strategic Partnership Analysis Strategic Roadmapping Technology Assessment Technology Commercialization Trust Strategy

Featured Videos

Background & Objective

The challenge or opportunity you are trying to address for the organization.

 In late 2026 John Ternus became the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Apple Inc., a company widely respected for its innovation pedigree. Steve Jobs set a high bar as CEO and became synonymous with a company known to “Think Different”, depicted in Apple’s viral video campaign in 1997. Apple, with Jobs as its leader, exemplified disruptive innovation[1]. As Ternus assumes this coveted leadership role at Apple, many are debating if and how he will maintain Apple’s entrepreneurial culture and leadership in the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI).  The equity market in 2026 presents a financial paradox. Wall Street consensus projects that Apple’s annual revenue and earnings growth would decelerate into the single digits, trailing other technology companies [Please see the FT.com article by Robert Armstrong]. Many of Apple’s peers, including rival Microsoft, have used AI to grow its offerings, especially in cloud AI infrastructure and enterprise model deployments. Apple largely failed in its internal efforts to grow AI capabilities.  Apple’s current valuation multiple has remained high in 2026. This is so despite its sluggish hardware refresh cycles and modest earnings projections. As noted by financial columnist Robert Armstrong in the Financial Times (September 16, 2026), Apple’s price-to-earnings multiple was higher than during the early high-growth era of the iPhone. Investors were not pricing Apple as a traditional hardware manufacturer or a hyper-growth software firm. Instead it seems that the market premium is being anchored in how Apple has created brand trust, platform stickiness, and an unmatched reputation for user data privacy.  For decades, design thinking at Apple had been inextricably linked with privacy and hardware-software integration. The collaboration between Steve Jobs and Jony Ive, design and beauty of the company’s products were sacrosanct. It translated this appreciation for design excellence into the capability to produce simple, human-centric hardware aesthetics that were paired with seamless user experiences. Over time, that philosophy evolved into a core architecture of security: processing data on-device, minimizing data collection, and positioning privacy as a fundamental human right. This positioning created an emotional and institutional moat that differentiated Apple from advertising-driven business models.  However, Ternus faced an unprecedented dilemma. The technological shift toward generative artificial intelligence and frontier large language models (LLMs) demanded multi-billion-dollar compute infrastructure that Apple had chosen not to build independently. To deliver competitive artificial intelligence features without falling behind, Apple chose to form deep strategic collaborations with frontier model rivals such as Google, OpenAI, and Meta. Ternus’s core challenge was clear: how could Apple scale frontier AI capabilities through third-party partners without eroding the very asset that justified its market premium: user trust? Apple's Ecosystem Moat: To evaluate Apple’s strategic flexibility in 2026, management had to candidly assess how the company sustained its dominant ecosystem economics. While corporate narratives emphasized product design and user experience, Apple’s extraordinary profitability, specifically its high-margin Services segment, which surpassed $80 billion annually, relied heavily on strict platform monetization and exclusive distribution agreements. Two major drivers underpinned this revenue engine. First, Apple enforces a monopoly on the App Store and the structure of commissions. It enforces absolute control over iOS app distribution and defends this legally. It maintains a 15% to 30% commission on digital goods and in-app purchases. Anti-steering provisions prevent developers from directing users to external payment systems and this secures pure-margin revenue for the company. Second, the company has an agreement with Google on how users search. Under an exclusive revenue-sharing deal, Google paid Apple an estimated $18 billion to $20 billion annually simply to remain the default search engine on Safari across iPhone, iPad, and Mac devices. This arrangement accounted for roughly 15% to 20% of Apple's total operating profits with virtually zero marginal cost. These strategic moats have come under attack by regulators in the United States and in Europe.

Learning Objectives

This is what students will learn as they complete the case.

  1. Students will learn about the complexity of managing a corporation such as Apple for growth and profitability. They will learn how to think critically about the challenge of innovating in the age of AI and the choices/trade-offs leaders have to make on whether to build their own technology, partner with frontier AI companies, or adopt a hybrid strategy. 
  2. Innovation requires strategic thinking about how to appropriate the fruits of their innovation investments. Students will learn about the strategic choices and how to make those without endangering rare assets that they have cultivated over time, such as brand identity, trust, entrepreneurial culture, capabilities, etc. 
  3. Assess how strategic partnerships can simultaneously accelerate innovation and create long-term technological dependencies.
  4. Evaluate privacy and consumer trust as measurable strategic assets rather than solely legal or communications considerations.
  5. Analyze how regulatory changes affecting platform distribution and search economics can influence Apple’s Services strategy.


Key Action Items

These are activities and action items you might want to complete in order to achieve the expected outcomes.

Milestones
Milestone #1
Guiding Questions
Deliverable
Suggested Outcome(s)

Milestone #2
Guiding Questions
Deliverable
Suggested Outcome(s)

Milestone #3
Guiding Questions
Deliverable
Suggested Outcome(s)

Explore the CapSource Case Library

Explore Case Library

The CapSource Case Library helps students explore real-world challenges faced by leading organizations across industries. Each case introduces a practical business or social impact problem and invites students to think critically about potential solutions.

Students can use cases to:

Discover potential career paths and industries
Learn how organizations approach strategy, operations, and innovation
Practice solving real-world challenges
Build a portfolio of real work product that showcase impact

Educators can register and browse the library for free. Upgrade for classroom use to bring experiential learning into your courses through case discussions, assignments, and competitions. The library is constantly growing and used by schools everywhere.

What you get when you upgrade:

Case notes and discussion/facilitation guides
In class presentation slides and teaching support materials
Visibility of student submissions and industry feedback
Evaluation tools and outcomes reporting

Unlock the Full Case

Create a free account to browse case materials, submit custom cases/case responses, and explore ways you can leverage this material to improve classroom engagement and enhance learning outcomes.

Register to View Full Case Details

Register Now

Already have an account? Log In

Educator or organization? Book A Demo